Encyclopedia Entry     •     Films Main

 

Harriet Craig

Critics' Reviews     •    Our Reviews     •    Movie Posters     •    Lobby Cards        Misc. Images

Click here to see photos from the film.


US VHS cover.Columbia. 94 minutes. US release: 11/2/50. VHS release: 2/20/96.

Cast: Joan Crawford as "Harriet Craig," Wendell Corey, Lucille Watson, Allyn Joslyn, William Bishop, K.T. Stevens, Viola Roache, Raymond Greenleaf, Ellen Corby, Fiona O'Shiel, Patric Mitchell, Virginia Brissac, Katherine Warren, Douglas Wood, Kathryn Card, Charles Evans, Mira McKinney.

Credits:  Based on the play "Craig's Wife" by George Kelly. Screenplay: Anne Froelick and James Gunn. Producer: William Dozer. Director: Vincent Sherman. Camera: Joseph Walker. Art Director: Walter Holscher. Music: Morris T. Stoloff. Wardrobe: Sheila O'Brien. Editor: Viola Lawrence.

 

IMDb page.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Critics' Reviews:

 

Bosley Crowther in the New York Times  (November 3, 1950)

 

    Do you remember Craig's wife, that nasty female who first appeared in a George Kelly play back in 1926 and has been haunting the movies, off and on, ever since? Well, she is back in the person of Joan Crawford, playing the role in Columbia's most recent remake. "Harriet Craig," which came to Loew's State yesterday. And, just between friends, we'd advise you to be wary of contact with her. Neither she nor her presentation have improved in the last fourteen years, which was when Columbia last loosed her with Rosalind Russell in command.

    As a matter of fact, the poisonous woman which the lacquered Miss Crawford tries to play, under Vincent Sherman's direction, is not so much poisonous as just plain dull. Miss Crawford persists so intently in a harsh mechanistic acting style that there is simply no reason or reality in the perfunctory shrew that she parades. It is as though an over-dressed clotheshorse, without character or sex, were playing the role. Why anyone should work up interest in her is more than we can see.

    And there's precious little interest in the screenplay which Anne Froelick and James Gunn have prepared and which Mr. Sherman has directed as though the whole thing were happening in a morgue. Slowly and tediously the meanness of Craig's wife is marched in review so that no one can possibly miss it, except the obvious dimwits in the play. These include Mr. Craig, the husband; a strangely adoring niece and the husband's boss, a doddering tycoon, to whom the lady glibly feeds a pack of lies. When finally her wickedness has been spelled out backwards and forwards and upside-down, the husband's eyes are slowly opened and he is allowed to give her the boot.

    We can't say we sympathize with him. He is such an impossible dunce as Wendell Corey plays him—such a simpering, apologetic dope who goes around sucking on a brier pipe as though it were a lemon lollipop—that he plainly deserves all the misery to which he is subjected much more than do we. If he represents the Ideal Husband, no wonder this is a woman's world. K. T. Stevens is likewise dopey as the lady's deluded niece. Viola Roache as a long-suffering housemaid plays the only credible character in the film.

    It may be this picture was intended for sloppy housewives to make them feel superior to the tidy monster in it. Okay, sloppy housewives; here's your film.

 

Variety (1950):

    Joan Crawford does a prime job of putting over the selfish title-character, equipping it with enough sock to cloak the obviousness that motivates the dramatics. Over the years, plot has lost freshness, but script up-dating, the strong playing, and direction add a sheen that keeps it interesting.

 

Otis L. Guernsey, Jr., in the New York Herald Tribune (1950):

    The film gives authentic movie star Joan Crawford an opportunity to command the camera's attention through an authentic star role. She remains, as always, a stylish performer in her clear and forceful characterization....Her vehicle may be somewhat laborious, but it is steady enough to carry Miss Crawford's act....In every mannerism of speech or gesture, Miss Crawford suggests that she is a queen in the country of the cinema, playing a dominant woman whose unkindly rule of her home has psychotic origins.

 

Stephen MacMillan Moser in the Austin Chronicle (2000):

     Joan, with director Sherman, trimmed all the fat away from Craig's Wife (that means removing every scene in which Joan would not be present) and turned it into a tour-de-force for La Crawford. As the epitome of every neurotic, deeply disturbed female that Joan ever portrayed, Harriet Craig is Joan with a capital J. Taking the role in her mouth and shaking it into submission, she is playing, ultimately, another facet of Joan herself.

 


 

Our Reviews:

If you've seen Harriet Craig and would like to share your review here, please e-mail me. Feel free to include a star-rating (with 5 stars the best), as well as any of your favorite lines from the film.

 

Mike O'Hanlon   (August 2007)

In order to truly appreciate Joan Crawford's performance in Harriet Craig, one must get the "Mommie Dearest" image of Joan out of their mind. In her pre-Harriet years, Joan Crawford was rarely unlikable onscreen. Even with 1939's The Women, the author of the play, Clare Boothe, had intended that the character of "Crystal Allan" receive the audience sympathy. 1950's Harriet Craig was the first time Joan Crawford had proved herself to be the completely unlikable bitch of the silver screen. Her performance in the title role never misses a beat.

The opening of the movie is a typical introduction to a classic movie villain, everyone running around in a panic while the villain enters calm and reserved. It takes a little while for the tension to build, but Joan Crawford's intimidating appearance fits perfectly when Harriet and her husband throw a dinner party. Joan's minor facial expressions reveal how important control is for this woman.

Don't be disappointed however; the beginning of the movie does move rather quickly. Her first act of cruelty comes when she verbally attacks the maids in the kitchen for their tardiness, and after one of them drops a tea cup, Harriet fires her and makes sure to deduct the cost of the cup from her salary. When her husband receives a promotion that will send him to Japan for a few months, Harriet Craig makes sure to visit her husband's boss and persuade him to change his mind by telling him that her husband is unreliable, and spends most of his time drinking himself stupid.

There are a few moments in Harriet Craig where one begins to wonder if this woman is more than just a complete bitch, but a pathological liar at that. She lies to her husband's cousin, played by K.T. Stevens, and tells her that her new boyfriend is just merely interested in sex, and would even marry her just to get what he physically wants. Though the whole lie seems ridiculous, Joan Crawford's delivery is so on key, she makes even the most unbelievable crap seem true. She also lies to her husband that she cannot have children because, gasp!, children will make the house a mess. Though it never states that is her reason for not having children, the movie as a whole clearly implies it.

After her lies are revealed, her husband calls her into the living room, where he smashes the vase that Harriet has cherished so as if it where her own child. The vase, and obviously house, are clearly personified as the children Harriet never had, so for her husband to smash the vase in rage... Well, he might as well have shot her.

Vincent Sherman's direction of the movie is reasonably impressive. I have always thought that he should have ended the film with Harriet going into the living room, cleaning up the mess her husband leaves, and then have her walk up the stairs by herself, alone, and completely comfortable. As for Wendell Corey's interpretation as the husband, well, he's okay, but it's difficult to imagine him and Joan Crawford ever being married. Franchot Tone, Fredric March, Melvyn Douglas, or especially Robert Montgomery, would have been better.

 

No doubt in my mind Joan Crawford should have been at least nominated for an Academy Award. Maybe if the movie had been more commercially successful, she would have indeed received an Oscar nomination, but it remains one of the strongest performances of the movie. And remember to forget the whole "Mommie Dearest" campy image before watching the film, so one can appreciate it more.

 


 

John Finley   (August 2007)

Rating:  star02_pink.gif star02_pink.gif star02_pink.gif star02_pink.gif star02_pink.gif of 5

 

What a movie, and I give it five out of five stars! Joan's acting was incredible, of course. I just wanted to put my hand in the television and beat her husband to the punch of knocking that vase over. I also wanted to beat Harriet. She needed a good butt whipping! The movie moved at an easy pace; not too fast and not too slow. All of the acting was first rate, and Mr. Craig's boss's wife was darling. Joan's acting was so spectacular that she made me hate her and believe that she was capable of doing anything. I was so mad at Harriet for going into Mr. Craig's office and telling his boss all of those lies! I thought that she would have loved for her husband to be promoted, so she could buy even nicer things, and perhaps even buy a bigger home!

 

In addition, the life-long maid of Mr. Craig's was right for telling Harrriet off. She was a great character. I knew the moment would come when she would finally give Harriet a piece of her mind. At times, I would get so mad at her coniving ass, I just wanted to throw my television into the street. One of the most memorable quotes happened between Mr. Craig and his frumpy friend in the sound lab. "So, why don't you come over and have breakfast with Harriet and I?" "Oh, no thanks. I'll just honk!" That was too funny, because Harriet's cousin's boyfriend had just said the same thing!

 

This was a wonderful picture, and now it's become a favorite of mine.

 


 

Maureen M. (2004)

 

As a lifelong vintage movie fan,  I don't suffer with the need to find something contemporary in a movie.  I am able to view a movie in context; to take into account the era in which it was produced, and the eras it represents.

 

However, I think "Harriet Craig" accurately represents many contemporary American marriages.  Reviewers then and now focus only on Miss Crawford's performance, but the story as a whole is a fascinating one.  (After all, it is adapted from a Pulitzer-Prize-winning play.)

 

It is enlightening, if you've waded through the slush about Crawford's monumental ego, to see her participate in the development of the subsidiary characters.  Crawford seems to know that because only the audience knows that Harriet is a liar, seeing the things that Harriet's lies motivate others to do tell us more about Harriet's needs than her dialogue ever could.  Here is the generous ensemble player her more accurate biographies reveal.  Witness and admire, for example, Crawford's careful craftsmanship in the setting down of her coffee cup so as not to upstage Wendell Corey in an over-her-shoulder breakfast scene.  The scene explains her husband's past, and exactly how it motivated him to marry Harriet.

 

In "Harriet Craig," a woman's desertion by her father creates an insecurity in her that manifests itself in a need to control every situation in which she finds herself, including marriage.  It's a complex psychological study of a woman and a marriage, and it gives one food for thought as why strong women sometimes marry genuinely weak, or seemingly weak, men.

 

The plot has juicy twists, so I won't write too much about it.

 

Although the audience knows that the husband was a mama's boy, we're shown that he regards becoming a married man as an assertive move toward the maturity he seeks.  Harriet didn't see her husband's oncoming maturity and independence until it was too late, and is now furiously backpedaling to stay in complete control of the marriage.

 

What makes this story so strong is that script and casting do not compromise the husband's attractiveness (or the complexity of the marriage's problems), by portraying him as mamby-pamby.  He is brainy, educated, and ambitious to move past his already responsible and well-paying job.  He is not unaware of Harriet's need for control, and sometimes expresses incredulity to her face in a kindly but forthright, or a kidding way.  This gives the movie a very realistic edge.

 

This movie is more complex than one is lead to believe it is by reviewers who look for a vein of campiness in everything Crawford does, and review only that.  Watch, for example, how Harriet's cousin and live-in secretary willingly fetches Harriet's  shoes, kneels, and puts them on Harriet's feet.  It might seem like Crawford camp, but it tells us much about the cousin character, and Harriet's relationship with her.

 

As in almost all of Miss Crawford's star vehicles, the director gives her several effective pantomimes to utilize her unique skill at this, and her silent-film experience.

 

A review I respect says that Harriet's feelings are dead-on correct about many things that other characters disregard.  For example, the warm, easy-going widow next door who invents reasons to nosily drop in is hardly as harmless as she seems.  Harriet alone knows that this woman could blow down her house of cards with her warmth and genuineness.

 

"Harriet Craig" is an interesting psychological study of a woman, and a must-have for Crawford fans to admire a seasoned screen pro at work.

 

 

 

Movie Posters:

          US 3-sheet. 41 x 81 inches.       country/size unknown

 

 

US half-sheet.         US. 14 x 22 inches.

 

 

Belgian.        Spanish.       US one-sheet.

 

 


 

Lobby Cards:

  

US title card.

 

     

 

     

 

 

Mexican lobby.

 

 


    

Misc. Images

 

US magazine ad.       US magazine ad.       US magazine ad.

 

 

A German program cover.